Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2000:
> The feature that I've missed the most from other mailers is some kind of
> reply-to-all function that, given a email message, composes an normal reply
> to the sender's email address, but also takes all the email addresses in
> the "To:" header and adds them to the "To:" header of the reply. Group
> reply only composes a normal reply but instead puts all the "To:" email
> addresses into the "Cc" header. Should I forward this request to
> mutt-dev?
Why should it matter whether the original To: recipients are added to
the To: or Cc: header? mutt-dev is the right place for
suggesting/asking/submitting features, but you have to have a good
reason for things...
In this case, if you really require the Cc recipients to be part of
To, what I'd do is do edit-with-headers, and then replace the Cc: header
name tage with some empty space. The result is that the Cc recipients
get moved to To header. It's a bit of work, but if you only need it for
some exotic situation, it's probably good enough.
Mikko
--
// Mikko H�nninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Gravity is a myth, the Earth sucks!
