> David DeSimone:

> Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't
> > have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no
> > resource files...
> 
> Is this really one of the design goals of Mutt?  I don't see a problem

as long as one can redefine anything compiled into the source, it's the
best way to go.


-- 
clemens                                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to