> David DeSimone: > Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't > > have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no > > resource files... > > Is this really one of the design goals of Mutt? I don't see a problem as long as one can redefine anything compiled into the source, it's the best way to go. -- clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. clemensF
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. Chris Green
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. David T-G
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. David DeSimone
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. David DeSimone
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. David Champion
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance... clemensF
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance... David DeSimone
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance... David Champion
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. clemensF
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. Gero Treuner
- Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance. Mikko Hänninen