Re: Priority set to urgent possible?!

[Eugene Lee]

On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
:Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
:> 
:> And oh, there's no standard specifying the possible values for this
:> header.  I've mostly seen "urgent" and "high" used, and of course
:> "bulk", "junk" and "list" for list emails.
:
: It is well documented in the SENDMAIL INSTALLATION AND OPERATION GUIDE.

But there's no RFC for it, is there?


-- 
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]