Kevin --
...and then Pieckiel, Kevin A said...
% Hello, all.
%
% How do I get Mutt to append mail signatures (via PGP 6.5.2) to the message
% rather than sending it as an attachment? I really dislike that Mutt takes
The short answer is that you don't. The somewhat longer answer is that
you use some macros to kludge it together.
Something like
macro compose S "Fpgps +verbose=0 -fat
+clearsig=on\ny^T^Uapplication/pgp;format=text; x-action=sign\n" # old-style
signing
macro compose E "Fpgpe -s -r RECIPIENT -r 0xYOURKEY -fat\nyapplication/pgp;
format=text; x-action=encrypt\n" # old-style encrypting ### have to hard-code
recipient for now...
might help you for pgp5; insert your key id at 0xYOURKEY (so that you
can read messages that you've encrypted for others) and insert your
recipient's identifier (email address, key id, whatever) at RECIPIENT.
There is a patch out there, I believe, which will let you insert %r at
RECIPIENT, but I forget what it is :-)
% signed and encrypted messages and makes everything separate attachments
% rather than stick everything in a single message body. I'm using Mutt 1.0
% as it is shipped with Mandrake 7.0, and PGP command line 6.5.2 for Linux.
Be that as it may, that's the way the RFC describes it, and so that's how
the mutt folks wrote it up :-)
%
% Thanks
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
PGP signature