> > I would vote in flavour of allowing mutt to be run as > > root, only to lock the memory blocks, then su to the > > user fast as hell. I'm not saying this is the right way > > for all users, but it might be a desirable feature for > > some. > > *grrr* > > We don't go to great lengths with mutt_dotlock to be able > to avoid running mutt with privileges, and then run it > suid root, right? Just like gpg, mutt could make use of mlock() where available. It doesn't require root privileges on all systems.
- pgp/gpg password, temp file? Jason Helfman
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file? Terje Elde
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file? Thomas Roessler
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file? Lars Hecking
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file... Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file... Terje Elde
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: pgp/gpg password, t... Terje Elde
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp file... Thomas Roessler
- Re: pgp/gpg password, temp ... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: pgp/gpg password, t... Christopher Smith
- Re: pgp/gpg password, t... Terje Elde
- Re: pgp/gpg password, t... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS