Re: why is mutt better?

[Ralf Hildebrandt]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:

> Bat! does have a couple of features that Mutt lacks, but those are the
> features that I do not need.  Maybe others do.

What features does it have?
 
> Unfortunatelly, I cannot use Mutt under Windows NT: it dumps core in the
> pager.  I've posted stack backtrace on mutt-dev, but nobody seems to

can't you use an external pager?

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
What about the four lusers of the apocalypse? 
I nominate: "advertising", "can't log in", "power switch" and "what backup?" 

PGP signature