Re: why is mutt better?

[Alan]

On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 07:22:05PM +0000, J McKitrick wrote:
[snip]
> Of course, the bat doesn't support IMAP, while mutt does.
> Other than that, it looks like it's just a matter of GUI vs text.

Hmmm... not according to it's feature list.  "support for imap4, pop, apop,
smtp protocols"

regards,

alan

--
Arcterex -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=|=- http://arcterex.ufies.org
'... I was worried they were going to say "you don't have enough LSD in your
system to do UNIX programming."'       -- Paul Tomblin in a.s.r