On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under FreeBSD. I'm
> able to handle both encrypted and signed messages. The only patch applied
> by the FreeBSD port system to the source code itself is in recommend.c,
> thus it should not be a issue.
>
> Only thing I can think off is that it might have something to do with me
> using Maildirs. Might be that the bug is somewhere in the mbox specific
> code. Both procmail and mutt support maildirs tho, so I don't really see
> any reason not to use them.
>
Try signing the following in-line - without using mutt's built in PGP
handling.
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When it's signed in-line and flows through procmail, the body get
rewritten to:
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the body is modified, the signature is no longer valid.
- chris
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"All general statements are false."
