Re: mutt and mh/procmail

[Thomas Roessler]

On 2000-03-01 07:15:28 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:

> Yes, I've noticed that mutt behaves in a rather unreliable
> fashion when it comes to this, too.

The mh code is far from perfect.  It should be fine for converting
legacy mh-style folders to something else, but I wouldn't use it in
production for incoming folders.  If there aren't any grave reasons
why you have to stick with mh folders, I'd suggest you switch to
maildir.

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/