Michael Elkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 01:52:16PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
> > now, the emails looks the exactly the same as the old style PGP signed
> > message, but when I view it in mutt, mutt shows that it is just a normal
> > message. Do I need to add additional header info such as Content-Type??
> >
> > Or the above just the completely wrong way to do it??
>
> I think it would work. Try adding
>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
I just tried. Now the header looks like:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: create domain
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
But when it sends over via mutt -H, the new header now looks
like:
From: Deus Ex Machina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: create domain
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
And the message is still not proper signed.
Shao.
>
> I don't remember off hand if -H picks up the content-type or not... It
> should if it does not.
>
> me
--
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _____
Department of Communications / __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _
University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/
_____________________________________________________________________________
PGP signature
