Mikko H�nninen wrote: > Nick Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 12 Jan 2000: > > Argh! I despise procmail, yes its powerfull, and can do alot, but > > it's severly anoying. > ... > > yes procmail is powerfull, but its far too much of a > > hassle for just setting up a simple filter, > > You could try maildrop instead, then. You might like that better than > procmail (or maybe not). I'll second that - maildrop syntax is much simpler, IMHO. Instead of: > .procmail: > ### Mutt users list > :0 > * ^Sender.*owner-mutt-users@mutt\.org > mutt-users-mail in maildrop you would have: .mailfilter: if (/^Sender:.+owner-mutt-users@mutt\.org/) { to mutt-users-mail } If you don't like that one too - try mailfilter. It is written in Perl and has even more "English-like" syntax. Hope this helps Sergei
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Shawn D. McPeek
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Morten Bo Johansen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Dan Lipofsky
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Sergei Kolobov
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Holger Eitzenberger
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jan Ulrich Hasecke
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes David T-G
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeffrey L . Taylor
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes David T-G