Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 1999-12-27 07:55:12 -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > based on a header (Priority: or Importance:) and then make that
% > entry in the index be reverse color (since I just use mono)? I
%
% I was actually thinking about flagging messages as important (the
% "!" in the index).
That's what I'd like, too, though coloring would probably be a little
more noticeable than just a ! char. So, now that I've found that the
proper header is simply "X-Status: F" I can add that to my macro that
writes Priority: and Importance: headers (since some MUAs use one and
some use the other -- and now we find that mutt uses a third).
%
% What you are proposing can be done with the usual index coloring.
Good. Off to the manual (unless anyone else out there wants to just
show me how to do it :-)
Actually, I think I need that help. I've tried playing around with such
things as
mono header reverse "X-Status: F"
mono index reverse "X-Status: F"
mono indicator reverse "X-Status: F"
and nothing seems to get me what I want -- the only results out of all of
that were to change *everything* to reverse once and to highlight the
header while I was reading the message. What I *want* is for the index
line of a flagged message to be reversed so that it stands out in the
display.
%
%
% --
% http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Thanks! and TIA
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
"Why2k? Well, I didn't think at the time that I could charge any more!"
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
PGP signature
