Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Eric Maquiling [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > I've been using PINE and PGP. I like viewing messages as a signed document > > rather than the body of the email and the signature as an attachment. > > It's nice you like it. It's not very practical or flexible, though. > > > Is there a way to have pgp signed mail as the body of the message (no pgp sigs > > as attachments) and to have pgp encrypted mail as the body of the message? > > Read the FAQ and doc/PGP-Notes.txt from your Mutt distribution (or if you > somehow don't have it, http://mutt.org/doc/PGP-Notes.txt). Yes, but here is just pgp2 example. I tryed change it to works with pgp5 but I faild. -- Keso be smart, don't be retard!
Re: pgp sigs in body of message instead of attach?
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE Thu, 9 Sep 1999 23:31:31 -0700
- pgp sigs in body of message instead of at... Eric Maquiling
- Re: pgp sigs in body of message inst... Jeremy Blosser
- Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE