David Thorburn-Gundlach [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> These days, ME isn't managing the code and I haven't seen a non-i
> version of mutt in a long time, so the distinction is somewhat moot.
> Perhaps it could be dropped for the 1.0 release and mutt officially
> moved "offshore".
The problem with this is that we'd lose packaging with several
distributions that only ship from the US, which makes it harder for people
to get and try Mutt (RedHat immediately comes to mind, though why they
don't yet have an ftp.non-us.redhat.com I'll never know).
Another option would be to make one source distribution with a compile time
option to leave out all the PGP code, but I have no idea if that would be
much harder to maintain than how it is now, and it would mean US only
groups couldn't distribute source code, just the castrated binaries...
well, they could do their own hacks to the source code to make it
US-broken^H^H^H^H^H^Hclean, but then we'd be back to where we are, eh?
I still do see X-Mailer headers with Mutt-non-i versions, usually from out
of the box RedHat users or other people who want binaries and aren't
willing/interested in finding full versions.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
PGP signature
