A quick examination seems to indicate that the mutt, exim combination gives one an all-or-nothing "solution" with bcc. Exim doesn't touch bcc headers and cites an RFC. Apparently if 'write_bcc' is unset, then _no_ bcc headers are written by mutt to _any_ recipient, and if 'write_bcc' is set, the bcc headers are written to _all_ recipients. Is there a way to have bcc headers _not_ written to the "To:" recipient, but have them written the "Bcc:" recipients (and included in the copy written to my outbox as a result of 'set copy=yes' and 'set record=+outbox'. Thanks. -- Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155 Technical Manager Phone: (206) 782-7733 ext 122 SSC, Inc. www.ssc.com Fax: (206) 782-7191 Linux Journal www.linuxjournal.com
