On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 05:13:38PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:

> Based on the two backtraces below, it is clear that it is those
> nasty GNU rx memory bugs biting again.  Unfortunately, nobody has
> ever volunteered to fix the GNU rx code for us, and those who have
> looked have reported that it's pretty messy.  In the next version,
> we'll be switching back to GNU regex, which should be much more
> stable.  In the meantime, there was already a patch floating around
> that replaced rx with regex; I'll try to find a copy and send it to
> you.  Thomas, maybe this would be a reasonable candidate for
> 0.95.2?

I don't have the source code at hand, but I think the switch from rx
to regex is already in the stable branch which will eventually
become 0.95.2.

tlr
-- 
Thomas Roessler · 74a353cc0b19 · dg1ktr · http://home.pages.de/~roessler/
     2048/CE6AC6C1 · 4E 04 F0 BC 72 FF 14 23 44 85 D1 A1 3B B0 73 C1
> Hi!  I'm Signature Virus 99!  Copy me into your signature and join the fun!

Reply via email to