On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 09:27:59PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 02:14:53PM +0200, evilrabbit via Mutt-dev wrote:
Please find below a number of confirmed security findings in the mutt client.
None of these are significant but should probably be addressed.

Thanks, I will start taking a look at these tomorrow.

Just to summarize the state for everyone.

Fixes commited to stable:
### 1. NULL Dereference in Signature Verification (MEDIUM)
### 2. Infinite Loop on GPGME Read Error (MEDIUM)
### 5. CRAM-MD5 HMAC Weakening (MEDIUM, Conditional)
### 6. GSSAPI Buffer Underflow (MEDIUM, Conditional)
### 7. URL %00 Truncation (LOW-MEDIUM)

Fixes commmited to master:
### 8. TLS Certificate CN Fallback (LOW-MEDIUM)

Won't fix:
### 3. POP3 Unbounded Memory Growth (MEDIUM)

Still to discuss/think about:
### 4. MIME Boundary Predictability (MEDIUM)

I'll make a stable release in the next week or two.

If anyone has comments about #4, I'd appreciate feedback. The email suggested perhaps ChaCha20 instead of LFSR113 PRNG. I don't think the situation is as dire as the "attack" suggests, but if the PRNG really sucks that badly, we shouldn't be using it.

--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to