On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 03:37:45PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Mutt-dev wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's going to barf if I perversely > > declare my character pointer as volatile and pass it to one of > > these functions, yes? (It would otherwise just be a warning.)
> Yes, and that's A Good Thing(tm). Previously, it was just a warning, > but it had Undefined Behavior, which you certainly didn't want. Okay, fair enough. But the error message would be opaque. I guess this is rare and/or stupid enough to not be an issue. ;-) Ian Collier.
