Dear all, Although I am responding to this message in particular, please consider this to be a response to all of you.
Many thanks to each of you for having taken the time to respond, all your responses did help me at some point. Steffen Nurpmeso (2023/04/14 02:47 +0200): > Ian Collier wrote in > <zdh4+qm3kqrjd...@cs.ox.ac.uk>: > |On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 05:05:31PM -0400, Craig Gallek wrote: > |> I've managed to get this to work with gmail: > |> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/blob/master/contrib/mutt_oauth2.py.REA\ > |> DME#L85 > | > |I have used the mutt_oauth2.py script to authenticate against an institu\ > |tional > |office365 account over IMAP (script is at URL above with .README removed). \ The same solution worked for me. > | I > |changed exactly two things in the script: (a) the GPG identity, and (b): > |'client_id': '9e5f94bc-e8a4-4e73-b8be-63364c29d753' Same here, but I have been caught by the fact that the client_id appears twice in the script and at first I didn't notice and did define it only in one place, which happened to be the one for google, so the URLs generated for Microsoft were wrong and I had to fix them manually until I understood the problem. > |(that's nicked from a recent public version of Thunderbird, which I > |guess is not strictly kosher but it does work as long as you remember > |this when you see the authorisation message from Microsoft asking if > |Mozilla should be allowed access to your email. The client secret is > |the empty string for this id. It saves the faff of having to create > |an app registration and it allows the 'common' endpoints to work rather > |than needing your tenant ID). One (likely naïve) question here: can't we, as mutt users, have mutt be registered as Thunderbird is? > I can confirm that this one works, both IMAP and SMTP are > possible, tenant=common! However, they now forbid "devicecode" > flow. "auth" works. ("redirect" not tried. And tThis is all my > script thing.) I did try redirect and the redirect URL has been reported as not conform to the one expected. Extra question although I do realise it's off-topic: did somebody try to make SMTP work with exim and OAuth2? For the case one would be offline while sending a mail that should be sent to the smarthost once one is back online... Many thanks again for your help! Sébastien.
