On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:47:40AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 05:34:23PM +0100, Rene Kita wrote: > > Does is make sense to test this with locale "en_US.UTF-8"? > > It helps to build with any locale, and at least make sure it runs. Testing > with another locale is of course also helpful. I quickly tried another one, > but since I don't regularly do so, it's easy for me to miss seeing a > problem. :) OK, running it with en_US.UTF-8 now.
> > JFYI: > > Not sure if this intended at the moment or you got some ignore magic > > going, but after building this branch the repo is left in dirty state > > here. > > That's a good point. I *did* notice it updated all the po files the first > time. I thought it might have just been an update artifact, but that's not > a good thing if it happens to everyone who checks out the git repos. > > Hmmm... it looks like there is a Makevars variable, PO_DEPENDS_ON_POT, that > might address this problem. Let me set that to 'no' and add a commit for > that. Including this commit I still got one untracked file 'po/remove-potcdate.sed', but no changed tracked files.
