On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 06:41:56PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 10:47:42PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I think that the manual should say more about these issues.
> > Perhaps discourage this sequence?
> 
> Or just remove it.  If it's not accurate (or even if it is) what value
> can it really provide?  Even when it *is* accurate the number of lines
> the user sees depends on how they're formatted, which also depends on
> things like display filters, etc.

Meant to also mention that it makes mailbox parsing slower, though the
user *may* not be likely to notice depending on the details of their
usage paterns and system resources.

It does not seem (to me) likely that the info would be used in any
sort of decision about whether to read a particular message or what to
do with it.

Anyway, I know it won't be removed, but there's my $0.0000002. :)

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Attachment: pgppDKuaTqyBL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to