On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > Wasn't there some recent-ish notion that Mutt would now require > vaguely modern (i.e. C99-compliant) systems to compile? If so, > doesn't that implicitly include having a /bin/sh that is POSIX?
Yes, I (we) have been trying to move in that direction. So perhaps it's a step in the wrong direction to support non-posix shells, when Mutt already requires a new compiler, SSL libraries, etc. I think because the change is so tiny, I don't mind bending a bit. I've already pushed a change to [-r], but if there turn out to be issues I'll go with your suggestion, Derek. Paul, for everyone's curiosity, is this the only issue you've hit with compilation? Also, what system are you running? -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
