2018-03-24 (Saturday), ke...@8t8.us (Kevin J. McCarthy): > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:40:21PM +0100, Philipp Gesang wrote: > > sometimes I need to refer to the UIDs corresponding to messages > > on the server for debugging reasons. I’ve been patching mutt for > > a while to add an index format to accomplish that. > > > > Would something like the attached patch be acceptable for > > upstreaming? Please let me know if that is the case; I’ll polish > > up the patch and resubmit. > > Hi Philipp, > > Thank you for sending the patch! > > Technically the patch looks fine, but after thinking about it, I'm -1 on > committing this. The UID isn't exposed in any other way, and generally > isn't interesting to users. If we expose it in the index_format it > opens up questions of limiting, sorting, etc.
That’s fine, I figured it might be out of scope for a MUA. Thanks, Philipp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
