changeset: 7171:bc43a7e56a42
user: Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>
date: Thu Sep 28 11:57:56 2017 -0700
link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/bc43a7e56a42
Enable $reply_self for group-reply, even with $metoo unset.
For a (r)eply, the $metoo variable does not have any effect because
there is a single recipient.
However with (g)roup reply, the To was initially set to the sender,
but subsequently removed my $nometoo. The empty To line is then
replaced with the Cc line, resulting in a (logically correct but)
surprising outcome.
Change the behavior such that $nometoo will not strip a single To
recipient when $reply_self is set.
diffs (12 lines):
diff -r e98ad5446640 -r bc43a7e56a42 send.c
--- a/send.c Wed Sep 27 13:45:36 2017 -0700
+++ b/send.c Thu Sep 28 11:57:56 2017 -0700
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@
* the user is the only recipient, it ends up on the TO: field
*/
env->cc = remove_user (env->cc, (env->to == NULL));
- env->to = remove_user (env->to, (env->cc == NULL));
+ env->to = remove_user (env->to, (env->cc == NULL) || option
(OPTREPLYSELF));
}
/* the CC field can get cluttered, especially with lists */
