On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:12:36PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote: > Please read the bug report, and shut up if you have nothing helpful > to contribute.
You apparently stopped reading before the part where I supplied a simple and efficient solution to the problem: On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:13:58PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > I'm not opposed to using libmagic for this, but I actually think the > heueristic code should be removed entirely from Mutt. Message bodies > should be assumed to be text, and attachments are assumed to be NOT > text, by virtue of them not being message bodies. Their types should > be determined via the standard MIME mechanisms. If those mechanisms > fail--for whatever reason--assume application/octet-stream and move > on. That guarantees the file will arrive unmolested and obviates the > need for some mostly pointless code in Mutt to try to guess what the > user was thinking. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:12:36PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote: > I know that you are an active contributor to mutt. Still it doesnt > help when people encounter a bug to deny that there is a problem, or > to reply telling the reporter that his bug report is inaccurate, > where in fact it is precise and correct. I didn't deny there was a problem dude, I provided a solution. I did however outline your possible contribution to the problem, and explain how it's supposed to work. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgpDY1UZtaSkm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
