* On 22 Jan 2017, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I think that a possible reason is to get more meaningful content when > a user puts Reply-To to his own address but without a comment, e.g. > > From: Firstname Lastname <user@domain> > Reply-To: user@domain > > So, "To: Firstname Lastname <user@domain>" is generated instead of > just "To: user@domain". If this is the real reason, this may be a > good feature, but I think that it would be preferable to do this > only if the Reply-To header had only an e-mail address, without a > comment.
I haven't looked at this code or any history behind it. However, it seems like the simplest and most correct (per RFC) behavior would be: always use the reply-to address if present. But if the reply-to comment is blank and the address is equal to From, sub in the comment that appears in From. I think this is the same as Vincent's description and is what the OP is asking for, but I'm trying to frame the logic in terms that make sense in documentation rather than code. -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
