On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:07:48PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > alias_reverse_lookup (a) > > Blech. I know Mutt tries to conform to GNU C coding standards, but > I've always sort of thought whoever came up with those should have > been hung by his toenails. In my eyes it's as if they were expressly > designed to minimize code readability. > > FWIW in the "real world" I've never actually seen them used, except by > MIT grads and extreme GNU fanboys. > > I'm not actually recommending, or even suggesting, to change that... > Just wrapping up an annoying day at work, and felt the need to voice > my general disapproval. :)
Yup, I understand completely. I've never seen it used before either. Strangely enough, I've gotten used to it, but that's probably because I've spent so much time in the Mutt codebase the past couple years... -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
