On 2016-04-11 19:20:16 +0300, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote: > I'm sorry to tell you that but in my experience git is superior compared > to hg, some things which require few long command lines in hg can be done > with one short (so less error-prone) command in git. Yes, that's opposite > to your experience. And note that there is a similar tool for git (which > allows work with hg repos). :)
I don't have much opinion. In hg, I like the availability of the revision number. But the date is not in the ISO 8601 format. > Anyways, hg is GUI-oriented while git is CLI-oriented so I would say, the > whole "git vs hg" thing is human-related one, i.e. it's about what's more > comfortable for people, but feature-wide they are not too far away. While I've already used the GUI for git, I've never used one for hg (and I didn't even know that hg had a GUI). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
