On Tuesday, 16 December 2008 at 14:14, Erik Hovland wrote: > > Anyway - how certain are you that those headers *never* provide useful > > symbols? > > I am not certain at all that they are *never* useful. In fact, all I > know is that they > are not useful on RHEL 5.2 (my build platform). > > The patch is meant to provide a starting point for cleaning up the headers and > not the end of the road. But I can understand if the group at large is > interested > in a more finished patch product.
I think we'll probably defer anything which has uncertain effects on portability until the start of the next dev cycle, so there's more time to work out the kinks.
