#3067: PGP/MIME signatures incorrectly assigned "Content-Disposition: inline"
Changes (by brendan): * type: defect => enhancement * component: mutt => crypto Comment: I'm not sure I agree that the disposition should be attachment. Although the RFC doesn't specify one way or the other, t->disposition was set to inline by the author of mutt and the PGP/MIME RFC in [c4f80a425496], 8 years ago. Since the content-type is correct, enlightened mailers can do the right thing, and unenlightened mailers can display the signature instead of a somewhat meaningless attachment. Personally I think it's too close to 1.6 to make this kind of change, but I'll keep the bug open for discussion. Hopefully others will chime in. -- Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3067#comment:1>
