On Tuesday, 04 September 2007 at 03:44, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2007-09-03 22:43:05 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Vincent Lefevre [07-09-03 18:02:13 +0200] wrote: > >> On 2007-09-02 15:14:25 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > > >>> Nah... tag-replying is a totally essential feature. :) > > > >> Yes, except that generates a reply DAG instead of a reply tree, and > >> Mutt won't display the DAG. > > > > Just out of curiosity: which mail client can with what kind of UI? > > I don't know any. But Mutt is the only MUA I know that has a > tag-replying feature and adds the corresponding message-ids to > the In-Reply-To header.
By the way, there's a nice DAG UI in the mercurial graphlog extension, which could in theory be turned on its side for mutt (though I doubt it's worth the trouble): o changeset: 5278:70e9a527cc61 | user: Alexis S. L. Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | date: Sat Sep 01 02:49:18 2007 -0300 | summary: convert: avoid dirstate checks; add a test | o changeset: 5277:a32a8e50d233 |\ parent: 5274:694eb9ccb54d | | parent: 5276:aea35488ea66 | | user: Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | date: Fri Aug 31 23:15:44 2007 +0200 | | summary: merge with crew | | | o changeset: 5276:aea35488ea66 | |\ parent: 5275:d3874a286b51 | | | parent: 5271:5c2ca6d6ab21 | | | user: Benoit Boissinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | date: Fri Aug 31 22:31:43 2007 +0200 | | | summary: merge with crew-stable ...
