On 26May2007 18:37, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On 2007-05-26 21:56:35 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > Of course, such a system isn't a UNIX system... | | Is there any reason why Mutt should not run on non-UNIX systems?
I can think of numerous things that might fail: maildir file names, curses support and ttys, etc. By the time you have all that you are well into POSIX support land and probably best off with a decent UNIXish environment. For example Cygwin on Windows. And in such environments, $PATH uses ":" as a separator as usual. The point here is that once you start trying to support nonUNIX, the number of things that suddenly must become tunable becomes very very large. Better to let a proper emulation layer (wine on windows, ape on plan9, etc) do all that and then _not_ try to cope with weird systems that do bizarre things like semicolon $PATH separators. But by all means handle UNIX variations. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon. --Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon- Extraordinary to Queen Victoria 1873.
