On 23May2007 13:33, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Is the problem with irregular behavior of different whiches?
I've never trusted it even to exist everywhere:-)
| Which is
| convenient but besides this has the drawback that since it's almost
| always a csh script, it sometimes returns csh aliases and such instead
| of what you really want.
|
| It's easy enough to add a which-like command though.
|
| where ()
Yes! I'd run with this myself.
| {
| echo $PATH | tr : '\012' | while read dir; do
This is more robustly written:
printf "%s\n" "$PATH" | tr : '\012' | while read -r dir; do
Unless that breaks on Solaris, which it may:-(
| [ -x "$dir/$1" -a ! -d "$dir/$1" ] && echo "$dir/$1" && return 0
|
| ## "return 0" returns from the do/done subshell, not the
| ## function. "false" here ensures that a "where" that does not
| ## find the program returns false at end.
| false
This is not necessary. The last loop iteration will get false from the
"read" condition of the while, and so the subshell will exit non-zero
anyway.
--
Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
If you can keep your head while all those about you are losing theirs,
perhaps you don't understand the situation.
- Paul Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
