On 2007-03-20 11:46:58 +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote: >>I disagree that the old mutt behavior is incorrect (to the best >>of my knowledge, there is nothing that says a message MUST be >>reflowed), but agree that other mailers' behavior might indeed >>point at an error at the time of composing the message.
> I didn't say the old one is incorrect, leaving the text as-is is > fine. Right. And I think it should be the preferred behavior. > Anyway, can I take the last part as a vote for leaving the handler in? :) Take it to mean that you've convinced me that the current behavior is probably not a bug in the strict sense of the word, but that I'd still prefer the old handler's behavior. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
