>Number: 2845
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: Bug#298121: header cache patch should use realpath for maildir
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 14 16:05:02 +0100 2007
>Originator: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Release:
>Description:
The following was submitted as Debian bug #298121:
----- Forwarded message from Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:31:06 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for mai=
ldir
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040907+3
Severity: normal
If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it using
"mutt -f Mail/drow", the header cache creates a second cache. They're
the same mailbox, but one is "Mail/drow" and the other is
"/home/drow/Mail/drow".
This could conceivably lead to false matches, also, since it uses relativ=
e
paths.
--=20
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.de> -----
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:00:53 +0100
From: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for mai=
ldir
Hello Dato,
* Adeodato Sim=F3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 07:10]:
> Just in case you didn't spot it already.
I described from the lists.
> > If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it usi=
ng
> > "mutt -f Mail/drow", the header cache creates a second cache. They'r=
e
> > the same mailbox, but one is "Mail/drow" and the other is
> > "/home/drow/Mail/drow".
I could hack something up next monday to prepend cwd if mailbox path
doesn't start with a '/'.
> > This could conceivably lead to false matches, also, since it uses rel=
ative
> > paths.
In praxis not.
Greetings,
Thomas
----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:57:39 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for mai=
ldir
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> * Adeodato Sim=F3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 07:10]:
>> Just in case you didn't spot it already.
> I described from the lists.
>>> If I open a maildir using mutt's mailboxes list, and then open it
>>> using "mutt -f Mail/drow", the header cache creates a second
>>> cache. They're the same mailbox, but one is "Mail/drow" and the
>>> other is "/home/drow/Mail/drow".
> I could hack something up next monday to prepend cwd if mailbox path
> doesn't start with a '/'.
That's not enough: I now hit the problem when opening the same Maildir
folder as "foo" and "foo/"; again two different caches are created.
(I typically use "foo" with the bash mutt-specific autocompletion
because that's what it gives me and "foo/" with the internal mutt
autocompletion on "open mailbox", because that's what it gives me.)
Also consider symlinks in the path, etc. Really, your best approach as
far as I understand is to use realpath() on the filename/path of the
mailbox before md5-ing it.
--=20
Lionel
----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.de> -----
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:29:31 +0200
From: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#298121: mutt: header cache patch should use realpath for mai=
ldir
Hello,
> Also consider symlinks in the path, etc. Really, your best approach as
> far as I understand is to use realpath() on the filename/path of the
> mailbox before md5-ing it.
yes, it is.
Thomas
----- End forwarded message -----
Christoph
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
>Fix:
Unknown
>Add-To-Audit-Trail:
