whats wrong with "background vocal" and what is the purpose of a change
to "backing"?
were all instances of "background vocal" in wikis and documentation
changed to reflect that change?
it should stay as "background vocal" unless its discussed and agreed to
change.

If everyone else on MB has to go through the proper channels for changes
to MB, why shouldn't mo? This seems to be a regular occurrence lately.
anyone else notice this?


Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> mo has changed "background vocal" AR attribute to "backing vocal" [1]. I
> personally think this is wrong, and as there was no discussion about this I've
> changed it back.
> 
> So I'm asking for opinions, should it stay as "background vocal" or was mo's
> change correct?
> 
> [1] http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4599939
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> 
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to