Orion wrote: > Brian Gurtler wrote: > >> no, it would not leave the entire database as bootleg. it would make the >> live concert DVD rips bootlegs where the source is the DVD (aka DSBD as >> far as live recording sources are labled outside of MB). >> Please expand on this, because it makes no sense to me how ripping out >> audio of a concert DVD is anything but a bootleg. > > > It doesn't make much sense to me why it would be bootleg. I buy a CD, > put it in my computer, open a ripping program, hit go, and have a bunch > of wav files that I can encode to whatever.
right, you buy an official CD that is sanctioned by the artist and its label I buy a live DVD, put it in > my computer, open a ripping program, hit go, and have a bunch of wav > files that I can encode to whatever. which is basicly making a bootleg audio CD out of a DVD. Same as if you were to record the audio from a television performance on the late show with David Letterman. If it were an official release, you would have imported a CD not a ripped audio from a DVD. > There's no difference in process > between the two for me other than using EAC for CD ripping and DVD no, but MB isn't about the process.. it's more about what it is. a bootleg is a bootleg. > Decrypter for DVD ripping, so it's hard to see why when I rip a CD it > would be official but when I rip a DVD it would be bootleg. I suspect > other people that rip the audio from their live DVDs feel the same way. > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
