On 2026-06-26, robert bristow-johnson wrote: > I don't really want to decode your code, but am interested in how > you're doing the polyphase thingie, how your polyphase impulse > response is defined (windowed-sinc or something else),
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On 2026-06-26, robert bristow-johnson wrote:

> I don't really want to decode your code, but am interested in how 
> you're doing the polyphase thingie, how your polyphase impulse 
> response is defined (windowed-sinc or something else), and how your 
> controller works (what compares the target delay [... to what?]

...thus far this seems like a nice list post.

> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This 
> message came from outside your organization.   ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

...and from here on something seems off. I don't much like to see 
garbling like this on one of the two lists I mostly follow, on-topic. I 
don't know what is happening, really, but if anything is going wrong 
here, this seems the most like AI/LLM here.

> I don't really want to decode your code, [...]

Repetition is quite the bad sign as well.

> That would be interesting to me.

As it would be to me. I can finally analyze multiphase right, in my 
near-fifties. It's nowhere as involved as the Fourier side of things. 
It's just about, well, using linear algebra to circularise a certain 
limited matrix problem, and so to parallelise it in computation, with 
correction factors. It won't take down your computational complexity, 
but it does compute with parallel hardware of lower cost.
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - [email protected], https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://decoy.iki.fi/front__;!!BDUfV1Et5lrpZQ!XD3A5ZOFbLdqwakJrKRZ0wNfozT45KGnDBm3lA3FPcsfpTubBAG01P6vEnGkH-giRJvhPodRvcxa0zUiFbY1IFg$
+358-40-3648785, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

Reply via email to