That opens up an interesting point. In my experience (although without
truly statistically significant results) people who are fascinated by
"analog synth sound" tend to have higher upper hearing boundary frequencies
than those who are not. About 10 years ago I could hear up to 16kHz at
moderate volumes (did a self-test). Some 2 years ago it went up only to
some 13.5kHz (at rather low volumes). Over this time I lost my fascination
with analog synth sound. For a while I was then fascinated by certain kind
of distorted guitar sound, but now that thing also subsided. I have a
conjecture that there might be something (actually various things) in the
upper frequency range which entertains the ear and thereby has a rather
strong impact on our enjoyment of the sound. At any rate I used to be
pretty picky about the details of the sound in the upper frequency range,
esp. filter response curves. Some of those things might be even audible
only subconsciously. E.g. I might not be able to tell differences in
aliasing amounts between two different virtual analog oscillator
implementations listened to in isolation, but when starting to use the
respective instruments in the mix, the difference became rather obvious,
although still difficult to grasp.

Best regards,
Vadim

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:32 AM Frank Sheeran <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andy Simper said:
> > you need to look at the
> > frequency response near nyquist and see how closely it matches
>
> I think that's mathematically true but how much can people actually hear
> above 10kHz anyway?  Unless they're like under 12 years old and in that
> case who cares what their opinion is of the sound? :-D   Maybe I just have
> too much hearing damage from my years playing reggae keys but when I was
> doing software dev in this stuff a decade ago I couldn't really hear the
> top octave at all (at age then of 45 or so).
>
>
--

Vadim Zavalishin

Reaktor Application Architect

Native Instruments <https://www.native-instruments.com/> – now including
iZotope, Plugin Alliance, and Brainworx

Reply via email to