Ray Donnelly <[email protected]> writes: [snip]
> I am also wondering if we > shouldn't be renaming the tcl and tk dlls like we do (ditching the > version number and the g if it existed). tcl/tk change infrequently > enough that I think the packaging overhead of going with what upstream > does isn't much, and they were named like that to avoid binary > compatibility problems. Having the version number on the Tcl/Tk dlls is standart practice as far as my 10 years of experience goes. > Óscar, can you send a pull request for Tktable too? Having PKGBUILDs > that aren't yet perfect (or even don't work yet) is fine IMHO so long > as the commit message makes it clear that it's WIP if it eases > collaborating on problems like this. I've added the -static-libgcc hack to the PKGBUILD. Without it, the application always crashes. With it, the problems are theorical. I mention the problem on a commentary on the PKGBUILD and consider the package ready for consumption. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Msys2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/msys2-users
