Hello Stevo, Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 21:35 schrieb Stevo Brock: > Hi list, > > We are trying to use LAME to encode a WAVE file to a 44.1kHz, 64Kbps, > CBR mono mp3 file and are having trouble matching the quality of the > same file produced by ProTools.
how about this, it uses similar lowpass as ProTools: lame --lowpass 13.6 01_11a.wav maybe_1.mp3 or for a VBR file (*) lame -V5 01_11a.wav maybe_2.mp3 or for another VBR file (*) lame -V5 --vbr-new 01_11a.wav maybe_3.mp3 (*) If it has to be CBR, you may try this too: lame -V5 -b64 -F 01_11a.wav maybe_4.mp3 > Currently we are using the following settings: > Source file 44.1kHz > 64Kbps > CBR > Stereo Mode Mono > Quality: 9 > > which gets us pretty close, but there are still some slight audible > artifacts. The ProTools file has no audible artifacts at all. > > Interestingly, as quality setting is increased, the output actually > gets worse. > > We don't know anything about the advanced acoustic settings. Would > that help our situation? > > Sample files are: > -original WAVE: http://monkey-tools.com/downloads/01_11a.wav > -encoded at lowest quality: http://monkey-tools.com/downloads/01_11a% > 20Q9.mp3 > -encoded at highest quality: http://monkey-tools.com/downloads/01_11a% > 20Q0.mp3 > -ProTools encoded: http://monkey-tools.com/downloads/01_11a_Protools.mp3 > > Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > -Stevo Brock > Head of Development > Monkey Tools > www.monkey-tools.com Ciao Robert _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
