Hi, On 7/14/05, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I compile Lame with either the Intel or > Microsoft compilers the output file (lame.exe) > is never less than 332 KB. (By the way, I'm > on a Windows XP machine.) > > However, I noticed that the executable found at > http://rarewares.org/dancer/dancer.php?f=2 is not > only smaller (184 KB) but also slightly faster at > encoding MP3s. > > I did some searching on the web and it seems that > the file was compiled using "Dibrom's switches". > Does anyone know exactly what "Dibrom's switches" > are, or how the file above was optimally compiled? > > I have Intel C++ Compiler 9 and MS VC++ 6. Thank > you for any help. Did you try to compile with GCC ? There's a windows version that you can download here: http://www.mingw.org/ That might not be what you want anyhow since on my machine, the executable is 345K, but my setting is different: Linux x86-64 compiled with GCC-3.4 If you want to optimize for size, most compilers understand the "-Os" switch. Hope this helps, Guillaume -- A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [email protected] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
