Hi, http://www.mp3dev.org/mp3/history.html
bye, Yosi >From: Daniel Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 recording - lame 3.88 or 3.92 better? >Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 06:29:21 -0700 (PDT) > >Hi, > >I have been working on an audio project for the last >week doing some simple audiocassette tape recording >onto hard disk then converting to mp3 or wav using >Audacity 1.0.0 (audacity.sourceforge.net) > >I have been using lame 3.88 (beta?) as the MP3 encoder >in Windows, and have recorded about 100 MP3's. I am >wondering if I should switch to use LAME 3.92 on >Windows, and Linux - does it have more bugs/better >quality/more features? Will there be any important >differences between the MP3's encoded with 3.88 and >3.92? Any better/worse compatibility with hardware >and software mp3 players? > >Any help/links/explanations would be greatly >appreciated. > >Thanks, >Dan _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
