On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Youri Pepplinkhuizen wrote: > I agree with the majority on this one. Lame is (or ain't..) an MP3 encoder > and not an audio processing tool. The only reason lowpass and resampling > filters were added is because such processing is required by Lame itself at > certain bitrates, and the newbies won't know at which specific bitrates they > should lowpass or resample (and definitely not how they should do it). Scale > has actual benefit over audio processing tools, because it is lossless. Any
isnt that the case with balance control as well as scaling? > options besides these are indeed just bloating the code. I'm not asking for > a built-in EQ either am I? a dozen lines is very small bloating /Erik -- Today is the first day of the rest of the mess _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
