removing many eponymous names from past….

 

>From the Washington Post:

 

Dozens of bird names honoring enslavers and racists will be changed

The American Ornithological Society says it will alter the names of North 
American birds named after humans, starting with up to 80 of them.

By Darryl Fears 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/darryl-fears/?itid=ai_top_fearsd> 

Updated November 1, 2023 at 9:52 a.m. EDT|Published November 1, 2023 at 9:00 
a.m. EDT

Error! Filename not specified.

An Audubon shearwater, named for John James Audubon, one of America's most 
famous birders and an enslaver. After two years of discussion and debate, the 
nation’s premiere birding organization has decided that birds should not have 
human names.

The  <https://americanornithology.org/> American Ornithological Society 
announced Wednesday that it will remove names given to North American birds in 
honor of people and replace them with monikers that better describe their 
plumage and other characteristics. The group said it will prioritize birds 
whose names trace to enslavers, white supremacists and robbers of Indigenous 
graves. Among them is one of the most famous birders in U.S. history,  
<https://www.audubon.org/content/john-james-audubon> John James Audubon.

“There is power in a name, and some English bird names have associations with 
the past that continue to be exclusionary and harmful today,” the society’s 
president, Colleen Handel, said in a statement. “We need a much more inclusive 
and engaging scientific process that focuses attention on the unique features 
and beauty of the birds themselves.”

Sometime next year, the society is expected to appoint a committee to explore 
up to 80 new names. The move, at an organization known for its reluctance to 
rename birds, was surprising even to the activists within the group  
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2021/bird-names-racism-audubon/?itid=lk_inline_manual_8>
 who requested it after a White woman in Central Park falsely accused a Black 
birder of assault in 2020. In a racial reckoning that shook the field of 
ornithology, the activists, most of them White, argued that the names of some 
birds were offensive to people of color.

 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2021/bird-names-racism-audubon/?itid=lk_interstitial_manual_9>
 American birders have their own reckoning

“We have seen a lot of changes in our world in the recent past,” Sara Morris, 
the society’s president-elect, said in reference to racial justice protests the 
followed George Floyd’s murder by a Minneapolis police officer and the Central 
Park incident involving birder  
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2020/06/23/christian-cooper-central-park-birder-comics/?itid=lk_inline_manual_10>
 Christian Cooper.

Racial insensitivity in the overwhelmingly White field of ornithology and 
birding should be rejected, Morris said. Recent reports projected that North 
America has lost 3 billion birds in the last 50 years, and “we need to engage 
as many people as we can in the enjoyment, study and conservation of birds as 
we can,” said Morris. “We need to break down as many barriers to participation 
as we can.”

Not every birder in the 2,700-member society is expected to welcome the news. 
Some who’ve memorized names established for more than a century are likely to 
push back. “Are we expecting that people won’t agree with this decision — 
sure,” Morris said. “But we’re proud of this decision. As we talked to people, 
many of them changed their minds.”

Jordan Rutter, a birder who organized the petition with her fiancé, Gabriel 
Foley, said the society’s action left her speechless. “That’s everything we 
asked,” said Rutter, who co-founded the group  
<https://birdnamesforbirds.wordpress.com/historical-profiles/profiles-a-z/> 
Bird Names for Birds, which listed about a dozen men honored with bird names 
and described their racist pasts. “I never thought this would be happening. ... 
What an incredible moment for the birding community.”

For the time being, birders of color who spot the Townsend’s warbler and the 
Townsend’s solitaire might be startled by the history of its namesake,  
<https://matthewhalley.wordpress.com/2020/06/16/the-literal-skeletons-in-the-closet-of-american-ornithology/>
 John Kirk Townsend. His journals describe his collection of skulls, stolen 
from the graves of Native people in the 1800s, to promote his theory that they 
were racially inferior.

In North America, where Indigenous tribes in what are now the United States and 
Canada encountered and named wild birds centuries before the arrival of 
European settlers, “White people are credited for discovering [the birds]. 
White people were the ones to name the birds after other White people. And 
White people are still the folks that are perpetuating these names,” Rutter 
said  
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2021/bird-names-racism-audubon/?itid=lk_inline_manual_19>
 in a 2021 interview with The Washington Post.

At least two chapters of the National Audubon Society voted to change their 
names and distance themselves from the enslaver who detested abolitionists and, 
by his own account, once guided a family of escapees back to their enslaver. 
The Audubon’s shearwater and Audubon’s oriole were named to honor him.

 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2019/09/19/north-america-has-lost-billion-birds-years/?itid=lk_interstitial_manual_23>
 North America has lost 3 billion birds in 50 years

Black birders who trace the Bachman’s sparrow and Bachman’s warbler to the man 
they immortalized,  
<https://birdnamesforbirds.wordpress.com/historical-profiles/profiles-a-z/bachman-john/>
 John Bachman, might find this passage in one of his speeches: “That the Negro 
will remain as he is, unless his form is changed by an amalgamation, which ... 
is revolting to us. That his intellect ... is greatly inferior to that of the 
Caucasian, and that he is, therefore ... incapable of self-government. That he 
is thrown to our protection. That our defense of slavery is contained within 
the Holy scriptures.”

Two members of Bird Names for Birds, Jess McLaughlin and Alex Holt, confirmed 
this history in library archives and helped bring it to the ornithological 
society’s attention, Rutter said. “It wasn’t, ‘Take our word for it.’ The 
evidence was right there.”

The society and its predecessor, the American Ornithologists’ Union, have 
managed a list of English-language bird names in North America since 1886. They 
are used by schools, government, conservationists, birders and other groups, 
the statement said.

Erica Nol, co-chair of the society’s Ad Hoc Committee on English Bird Names, 
said members took the issue seriously from the day the committee was formed 
more than a year ago. Meeting every two weeks via Zoom, they came up with a 
priority list of names to consider changing.

At first, the diverse White, Black and Latino members failed to arrive at a 
consensus. In addition to North American birds, they mulled changing the names 
of South American birds but eventually decided that it was not their place.

Months later, the members came to the realization that all eponymous names were 
problematic. “They imply possession of a species,” Nol said. “They are 
overwhelmingly from a particular time and social fabric, they are almost all 
White men, few women, and women were almost all first names. Our main goal was 
to increase the birdwatching public."

The committee startled the society’s leadership with its recommendation to 
change all English bird names and at least two cultural names of birds that did 
not make sense. “The name should be descriptive of the bird,” Nol said.

Both Morris and Judith Scarl, the chief executive and executive director, 
agreed with Nol’s observation that the society’s leadership looked at them as 
though they were crazy. “There were hard questions about how we would justify 
this,” Nol said.

 
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/07/28/audubon-birds-enslaver-seattle-name-change/?itid=lk_interstitial_manual_38>
 The largest Audubon group yet is changing its name, rebuking an enslaver

“This is a historic, momentous decision,” said Scarl. “This is the way to go. 
We are going to work hard to bring people along to that understanding.”

Kenn Kaufman, a society member, started birding at age 6. “I was a little kid 
in South Bend, Indiana, and got interested in birds because they were there and 
they were fascinating,” he said. “Some of these bird names I’ve been using for 
a half century.”

Overall, Kaufman said, “I thought it was a mess to go in and change all these 
names.” But he started talking with people such as Rutter and Drew Lanham, a 
Black ornithologist and professor at Clemson University in South Carolina. “As 
the conversation went on I realized they were changing my mind. It’s amazing 
how more information can do that,” he said.

“I’m sure there are going to be objections,” Kaufman said. “I’m sure the term 
‘woke’ will be used. I still don’t know what that means. I just hope they can 
come around to see this from the view of groups of people who may have been 
marginalized in the past.”

 


----
General information and guidelines for posting: 
https://moumn.org/listservice.html
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

During the pandemic, the MOU encourages you to stay safe, practice social 
distancing, and continue to bird responsibly.

Reply via email to