There is a lot of debate about when it's appropriate to release scientific
reports. Must we wait until all the data is in to let people know about a
serious concern? Non-migratory Northern Cardinals that wander northward in
late summer/fall have been supported in winter survival by the railroads
keeping snow cleared and spilling grain since the late 1800s, and then by
bird feeding, so obviously climate change is not the only factor or even the
primary factor behind their northward range expansion. It's ever so easy to
look one by one behind the factors in this report and tear them apart,
because nothing in nature is simple.

But as Christine says, this is a data-supported study, and a compelling one
at that, looking into one important contributor to a host of range shifts
and expansions of birds. It is the job of scientists to search for holes in
this, and to fill them with ever-on-going research. But Audubon is not
strictly a scientific organization--it is an advocacy group, advocating for
the birds we love. Scientists are required within their discipline to be
neutral: a scientist would have kept careful data about the decline of the
Passenger Pigeon, noting the habitat destruction, the wanton shooting, and
the market hunting, and even a century after the species was rendered
extinct would be arguing with other scientists about which factor was most
important in causing the extinction.

It's the job of Audubon not to track the demise of various species of birds,
but to prevent them, using honest and scientifically-based research, but not
sitting on studies until every single factor can be teased out.

I am a passionate advocate of scientific research, and I'm as quick to spot
flaws in reports as any. But I'm also a passionate advocate of birds.  I
disagree that this report is premature, or that because there are certain
deficiencies in some of the science at this point in time that the release
should have been delayed. Every day that we delay putting out reports and
press releases about the bad effects of climate change, the earth keeps
warming. Audubon's role in this is similar to that of a person who comes
upon a child bleeding profusely in the middle of a busy road. Was the child
hit by a car, a bus, or a truck? Was it a semi, a dump truck, or a delivery
truck? Fed-Ex or UPS? Let the forensic scientists argue the fine points. The
child is bleeding and in the path of other trucks, and anyone with a heart
as well as intelligence knows to get the child out of the path of more
danger, stop the bleeding, and call for an ambulance. That's Audubon's role
in the climate change debate, and this report is a sensible and timely
action.


-- 
Laura Erickson
Somewhere at or between Duluth and Ithaca


Twin Beaks!  www.twinbeaks.blogspot.com
iTunes podcast of For the BIrds
http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=288123640

For the love, understanding, and protection of birds

There is symbolic as well as actual beauty in the migration of birds.  There
is something infinitely healing in the repeated refrains of nature--the
assurance that dawn comes after night, and spring after the winter.

--Rachel Carson

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

----
Join or Leave mou-net:http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives:http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to