On Jun 27, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Igor Russkih wrote: > Moreover, Mono.Security assembly is shipped stripped, in particular it misses > StrongName class - so even manual validation is not possible.
Odd; my Mono.Security.dll contains it. > What is the background behind these decisions? I don't know why strong named assemblies aren't validated for you; we'd need a test case for this. I do know that we screwed up when we started signing Mono.Android.dll and the other BCL assemblies, as they're not signed with a proper key; they're delay signed, and then never signed (because they're using the .NET public key, so we can't actually sign them at all; Doh!). - Jon _______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
