And all I've done for the last 30 minutes is go through a really tedious loop of build, add missing explicit reference, build, add missing explicit reference, build, add missing explicit reference, build, ...
... so now I'm **really** in favour of MonoDroid getting implicit references again :) Maybe it's my fault for having lots of small DLLs? But the reason I have lots of small DLLs is so I can try to reduce the size of the deployed image in MonoTouch. Stuart On 17 May 2012 20:59, Stuart Lodge <m...@slodge.com> wrote: > Hope you are enjoying the conversation :) > > I really think you should pull in all the implicit references. > > My main reason is because this is what .Net developers are used to... it's > what WPF, ASP, SL, WP7, etc all do > > My second reason is because if you don't support implicit references, then > all you are doing is putting extra maintenance hassle on us poor developers > - my apps currently won't build unless I explicitly add all the implicit > references and adding them is boring, and error prone... plus the current > error messages take a lot of decoding (as we've proved in this email thread) > > Hope that helps.... :) > > Stuart > > P.S. I'm also really keen to talk PLPs/PCLs with you guys too - I'm loving > using them in MonoDroid already :) > > > On 17 May 2012 19:49, Jonathan Pryor <j...@xamarin.com> wrote: > >> On May 17, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Jonathan Pobst wrote: >> > One thing to keep in mind is if we do things implicitly, there is no >> way to opt out if you don't want the assembly to end up in your apk. >> >> Yes, but MonoTouch does support implicit references. >> >> Decisions, decisions... >> >> - Jon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Monodroid mailing list >> Monodroid@lists.ximian.com >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
