Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014 17:19:56 UTC+2 schrieb Charlie Brady: > > > No, RHEL does have a mechanism of resolving dependencies. 'yum' will do > that. However many of the modules required by Plack are not included in > the standard RHEL repositories. >
Then use another distribution. I always came back to Debian in the last 16 years. Or use CPAN directly, or perlbrew+cpanm, or carton, or ... > The only point I am making is that this assertion is false: > > Literally all you have to do is change the shebang line. > > CGI "just works". It would be a shame to see it be removed. Why not remove something deprecated? >From what I can see, deployment using PSGI under apache is signficantly > more complex than with CGI, and not necessarily less error prone: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mojolicious/oXeCLxe6hIY > As I was involved in this thread, I cannot see why you got the impression "it's complicated". E.g. with mod_perl it's as simple as the wiki chapter https://github.com/kraih/mojo/wiki/Apache-deployment#apachemod_perl-psgiplack which I reviewed and changed. Users think complicated, and I also did in my first attempts. I needed many hours to go deep in the details of Plack/PSGI and other sources to learn the hard way, that it is simple. IMHO users of Apache make the mistake to solve non-existing problems in Apache, thinking CGI/PHP, doing url-rewrite, redirect and so on. And that's harmful, where I can understand sri not willing to support or debug insane configurations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
