Hi Ron,
Gearman package originally created by BRADFITZ contained:
lib/
└── Gearman
├── Client.pm
├── JobStatus.pm
├── Objects.pm
├── ResponseParser
│ └── Taskset.pm
├── ResponseParser.pm
├── Task.pm
├── Taskset.pm
├── Util.pm
└── Worker.pm
Regarding to the comment in
https://api.metacpan.org/source/DORMANDO/Gearman-1.12/lib/Gearman/Objects.pm
was Objects.pm not realy usefull at all. Therefore I replaced it by Base.pm, a
parent for Gearman::Client and Gearman::Worker. That's only change I actually
did on the hole Gearman package.
I guess missing permissions are a part of my request about maintainership three
days ago. See the mail below.
So to get rid of indexer faults I need permissions for all in Gearman package
defined modules:
Gearman::Base
Gearman::Client
Gearman::Job
Gearman::JobStatus
Gearman::ResponseParser
Gearman::ResponseParser::Taskset
Gearman::Task
Gearman::Taskset
Gearman::Util
Gearman::Worker
BR,
Alexei
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: Alexei Pastuchov <i...@maximka.de>
> To: b...@danga.com, dorma...@rydia.net, modules@perl.org
> Date: 17 May 2016 at 14:17
> Subject: Fwd: Re: Gearman-1.12
>
> Dear all,
> I'm going again to ask for co-mainter permissions on the Gearman module to be
> able to close open issues. Because some of the issues are opened for seven
> years:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Gearman
>
> Some of the issues are closed in unauthorized release:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100594
>
> BR,
> Alexei
>
> > ---------- Original Message ----------
> > From: Alexei Pastuchov <i...@maximka.de>
> > To: dormando <dorma...@rydia.net>
> > Date: 19 December 2014 at 16:35
> > Subject: Re: Gearman-1.12
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a short report about my work.
> >
> > - Bug 46373
> > use $worker->work( stop_if => sub { return shift } ) instead of
> > $worker->work(
> > stop_if => sub { return shift } )
> > see bug 89382
> >
> > - Bug 78710
> > it's an issue for a maintainer. I'm a volunteer yet.
> >
> > - 85191
> > lost connection, etc. will be managed in work sub by calling uncache_sock if
> > some thing gone wrong.
> > The behaviour of Worker.pm does not changed after patching.
> > - Bug 85192 fixed
> >
> > - Bug 88054
> > the is no timeout option in Client v1.12. command_timeout=30 on default is
> > used
> > in _option_request sub
> > I'm not sure you'll use command_timeout property in proposed way in
> > _get_js_sock.
> >
> > - Bug 89037
> > fixed
> >
> > - Bug 91973
> > use of environment variable GEARMAN_SERVERS will solve the issue
> >
> > - Bug 94403
> > it's not an issue in v1.12
> > $jssock check is applied in Taskset->add_task
> >
> > - Bug 100594
> > is fixed
> >
> > - I've added two new tickets: 101012, 101013
> >
> > - cpan tester report 586f5968-8489-11e4-adb9-802de0bfc7aa is - ugly - fixed
> > too
> >
> > All described issues are in
> > https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client/tree/upstream and on
> > https://metacpan.org/pod/release/PALIK/Gearman-1.12.001/lib/Gearman/Client.pm
> > Your feedback is welcome.
> >
> > Please give me co-maintenance permissions If you are interested in my
> > further
> > support.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alexei
> >
> >
> > > dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> hat am 16. Dezember 2014 um 19:39
> > > geschrieben:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > if you'd like to maintain it, hop on the public mailing list. Look over
> > > the RT buglist and any PR's in github and create tested integration trees
> > > for upstreaming. I'll review each tree and cut a release from it, and if
> > > you're able to cut things down well enough I'll give you commit and upload
> > > bits.
> > >
> > > So far nobody else has stepped forward. We need someone who'll actively
> > > watch the community and deal with open requests.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Alexei Pastuchov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for quick response.
> > > > I've imported v1.12 in upstream
> > > > https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client/tree/upstream and started
> > > > failed tests bug
> > > > fixing
> > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/distro/G/Gearman.html?oncpan=1&distmat=1&version=1.12
> > > > Then I would add SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-solution from the master branch in
> > > > v1.12
> > > > too.
> > > > If you have a new maintainer candidate, let him know about my work.
> > > > If no, let me maintain it because I'm using the package over a year in
> > > > our
> > > > production environment and now have to start to bug fixing gearmand
> > > > self. https://bugs.launchpad.net/gearmand/+bug/1348865
> > > >
> > > > I never used Gearman::Server, but I would maintain it too if you mind.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alexei
> > > >
> > > > > dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> hat am 16. Dezember 2014 um 08:21
> > > > > geschrieben:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm looking for a new maintainer on the Gearman::Client and
> > > > > Gearman::Server modules. In the meantime I shipped what was already
> > > > > sitting in the repos but unreleased.
> > > > >
> > > > > Need someone trustworthy who has the time to carefully review patches
> > > > > and
> > > > > avoid regressions for any production users of this old, relatively
> > > > > stable
> > > > > codebase.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the neglect for so many years on it :/ I feel pretty bad for
> > > > > not
> > > > > trying harder.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Alexei Pastuchov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > there is a new release of Gearman in CPAN appeared. It’s look like
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > are working on it.
> > > > > > A few weeks ago I’ve reported a SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-bug in v1.11
> > > > > > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100594
> > > > > > It is very important for me, because in my company the deployment
> > > > > > depends on in Debian contained packages. For Gearman it’s currently
> > > > libgearman-client-perl related to Gearman v.11.
> > > > > > To be able to create an SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG job I’ve created a v1.11
> > > > > > Backport https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client
> > > > > > But if Debian takes v1.12 without SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-bug fix, I’ve
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > back port it again.
> > > > > > I’ll gently ask you if you intend to apply to the ticket appended
> > > > > > patches?
> > > > > > If you need any help it would be my pleasure to support you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Alexei
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
